Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Arrabal v. Crew-Taylor

12/3/2004

On October 17, 1998, Tracy Crew-Taylor entered Harbor Hospital Center in Baltimore. She was expecting triplets, who were at thirty weeks, two days gestation. Her treating physician, Dr. Pedro P. Arrabal, diagnosed Mrs. Crew-Taylor as suffering from gestational diabetes. Mrs. Crew-Taylor delivered two daughters (Cache and Sashe) and a son (Che) on the afternoon of October 19. The two girls were in good physical shape. Che had no pulse when delivered and did not breathe for the first fifteen to twenty minutes afterward. He was revived but thereafter was in a "vegetative state" and suffered from numerous physical problems, including profound hearing loss and blindness. He spent most of his life (fourteen months) in various hospitals and died from his pre-birth injuries on December 6, 1999.


A three-count complaint against Dr. Arrabal and Harbor Hospital Center, Inc., was filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City on April 4, 2001. All counts of the complaint alleged that Harbor Hospital Center's agent, Dr. Arrabal, deviated from the applicable standard of care by failing to deliver the triplets immediately upon receipt (on October 18) of test results showing that the fetuses were experiencing distress. Count I, a survivorship action, was filed by Mrs. Crew-Taylor as personal representative of Che's estate. Count II was a wrongful death action filed by Che's father, Charles Taylor, and his mother, Mrs. Crew-Taylor. Count III, captioned "Lack of Informed Consent," also was filed by Che's parents. That count read, in part, as follows:


39. Although the efendants knew and/or in the exercise of reasonable obstetrical and/or perinatology care should have known that Mrs. Taylor and/or Che Taylor's condition was indicative of fetal distress and the need for timely delivery of Mrs. Taylor's triplets, they failed to inform Mr. and Mrs. Taylor of this important fact.


40. Contrary to acceptable standards of obstetrical and/or perinatology care, the efendants failed to timely deliver Mr. and Mrs. Taylor's triplets.


41. By failing to inform Mr. and Mrs. Taylor of Mrs. Taylor and Che Taylor's condition and that diagnostic, EFM and other testing clearly indicated that delivery of her triplets was indicated, the efendants breached their duty to obtain the informed consent of Mr. and Mrs. Taylor prior to commencing their decision to prolong the pregnancy in light of clear signs of fetal distress.


42. The efendants negligently failed to disclose to Mr. and Mrs. Taylor all material information regarding the course of treatment they proposed (prolonging the pregnancy), the risks to Mrs. Taylor and the fetuses of prolonging the pregnancy, the probability of having healthy fetuses if delivery was/is to be performed sooner as opposed to later, and the risks and consequences associated with hypoxia and acidosis should a trial of labor, vaginal delivery and/or prolonging the pregnancy were attempted.


43. Mr. and Mrs. Taylor were not provided with any alternatives to the efendants' proposed treatment of prolonging the pregnancy, in particular earlier delivery of the triplets.


44. If Mr. and Mrs. Taylor, and any reasonable person in their situation, would have been advised of the risks, complications and consequences associated with allowing the labor and/or pregnancy to progress/continue, they would have withheld their consent to prolonging the pregnancy and would have requested the timely delivery of their triplets.


45. The efendants further failed to inform Mr. and Mrs. Taylor that there was evidence of fetal distress and that more severe and diffuse brain injury increases with the severity and duration of any hypoxic or ischemic

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 

Maryland Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE