 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Putnam v. Sezgin12/2/2004
tiffs failed to demonstrate a palpable error by which the court and the parties were misled, and they failed to show that a different disposition of the motion must result from correction of any error. MCR 2.119(F)(3). The trial court initially heard, and implicitly rejected, the argument that the impending bankruptcy order would operate to change the outcome of the case. Our review of the order that was eventually entered by the bankruptcy court fails to reveal any intent by that court to retroactively lift the stay, thereby making the initial filing of the complaint valid. Thus, the order has no effect on the trial court's decision granting Dr. Sezgin summary disposition.
Affirmed.
Pat M. Donofrio, Jane E. Markey, Karen M. Fort Hood.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Michigan Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|