 |
|
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Borger v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada12/29/2004 es in the substantive law may not unduly impinge upon the ability of the judiciary to manage litigation, we conclude that a district court, within its sound discretion and considering the need for judicial economy, may grant leave to amend malpractice complaints supported by disputed affidavits under circumstances where justice so requires. Retention of this discretion in conjunction with the requirements of NRS 41A.071 is consistent with well-recognized notions of separation of legislative and judicial powers.
CONCLUSION
Because the district court manifestly abused its discretion in granting Dr. Lovett's motion to dismiss, because our intervention to correct that error will further important considerations of judicial economy to prevent multiple proceedings arising from the same case, and because the issue here is in need of clarification for the bench and bar in general, we grant the petition. Accordingly, we direct the clerk of this court to issue a writ of mandamus instructing the district court to vacate its order of dismissal and reinstate petitioner's action against real parties in interest James Lovett, M.D., and Lewis & Lovett, Ltd., d/b/a Desert West surgery.
ROSE and DOUGLAS, JJ., concur.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 Nevada Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
|
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|