 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Lester Building Systems v. Lousiana-Pacific Corp.2/17/2004
review denied (Minn. Nov. 18, 1985); Spinett, Inc. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co., 385 N.W.2d 834, 841 (Minn. App. 1986).
The trial court noted that the jury, in exercising its discretion, determined that lost profits had been proven. The parties' experts presented conflicting testimony on Lester's lost profits. LP's expert testified that the hog market was very soft and attributed that to Lester's drop in profits. Lester's own witnesses, including its former president, published articles about the collapse of the hog industry. The jury could have found that the state of the hog market contributed to Lester's drop in profits. Because we conclude that the jury exercised its discretion to determine the proper calculation of Lester's lost profits, pre-judgment interest is not appropriate, and we affirm.
Affirmed.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Minnesota Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|