 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Turvey v. Ocheltree2/10/2004
liability policy, because, as a preliminary matter, the CGL Policy does not specifically identify motor vehicles. As such, we find the policy is not a motor vehicle liability policy. Werstler v. Westfield Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2002CA00227, 2003-Ohio-1715.
The policy does not specifically identify vehicles contained in either the mobile equipment or the valet parking provision; therefore, we find the CGL Policy is not a motor vehicle policy pursuant to R.C. 3937.18(L)(1), and UM/UIM coverage is not afforded to appellants.
Appellants' second assignment of error is overruled.
The June 6, 2003 Judgment Entry of the Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.
Farmer, J. and Wise, J. concur
|