Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Renter v. Anthony

2/5/2004

vehicle liability policy of insurance" under R.C. 3937.18(L), as amended by Am.Sub.H.B. No. 261. The statute defines such policies as, e.g., " ny policy of insurance that serves as proof of financial responsibility, as proof of financial responsibility is defined by division (K) of section 4509.01 of the Revised Code, for owners or operators of the motor vehicles specifically identified in the policy of insurance." "Proof of financial responsibility" means "proof of ability to respond in damages for liability "arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle *."


. The coverage afforded by the exception to the exclusion does not apply to such liability, so this policy could not serve as proof of financial responsibility. Therefore, it is not an automobile liability or motor vehicle liability insurance policy as to which UM/UIM coverage had to be offered.


Conclusion


. For the foregoing reasons, we find that neither plaintiff nor her decedent were insured for UM/UIM coverage under the business auto and integrated risks policies which Federal issued to plaintiff's employer. Furthermore, we find the general liability policy was not an automobile liability policy as to which Federal was required to offer UM/UIM coverage. Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for the entry of judgment in favor of Federal.


. This cause is affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.


FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J., concurs.


SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.,dissents., JAMES D. SWEENEY, J., RETIRED, OF THE EIGHTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS SITTING BY ASSIGNMENT.


It is, therefore, considered that said appellants recover of said appellees their costs herein.


It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to the common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.


A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.






Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Ohio Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE