 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.9/4/2003
gnored. Allstate Ins. Co., 676 So. 2d at 275. In this situation, benefits under the two policies are pro rated according to the coverage limits of each policy. Id. As such, the trial court correctly refused to grant Grange's motion for summary judgment.
CONCLUSION
. The trial court correctly held Chrisann to be a resident of John and Cathy's household. The duties of Grange and USF&G;under their policies were identical. The trial court used the proper legal standard in granting USF&G;s motion for summary judgment and properly denied Grange's motion for summary judgment. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
. AFFIRMED.
PITTMAN, C.J., McRAE, P.J., WALLER, COBB, EASLEY AND CARLSON, JJ., CONCUR.
GRAVES, J., CONCURS IN RESULT ONLY. DIAZ, J., NOT PARTICIPATING.
|