 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Bowman v. State3/19/2003
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
The Pulaski County Circuit Court denied the request of the appellant, Betty Faye Bowman, to transfer the felony charge pending against her in circuit court to the juvenile division. Appellant brings this interlocutory appeal arguing that the trial court erred in declining to transfer her case. We affirm.
On April 26, 2001, the State filed an information in the Pulaski County Circuit Court charging appellant with first-degree murder, alleging that on November 16, 2000, she purposely caused the death of Samuel Hendricks. Because she was sixteen years old at the time of the alleged crime , appellant filed a motion to transfer the case to juvenile court. See Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-318(c)(1) (Repl. 2002). After a hearing, the circuit court entered an order denying the motion.
When considering a motion to transfer a case to the juvenile division, a trial court must consider all of the following factors: (1) The seriousness of the alleged offense and whether the protection of society requires prosecution as an extended juvenile jurisdiction offender or in the criminal division of circuit court;
(2) Whether the alleged offense was committed in an aggressive, violent, premeditated, or willful manner;
(3) Whether the offense was against a person or property, with greater weight being given to offenses against persons, especially if personal injury resulted;
(4) The culpability of the juvenile, including the level of planning and participation in the alleged offense;
(5) The previous history of the juvenile, including whether the juvenile had been adjudicated a juvenile offender and, if so, whether the offenses were against persons or property, and any other previous history of antisocial behavior or patterns of physical violence;
(6) The sophistication or maturity of the juvenile as determined by consideration of the juvenile's home, environment, emotional attitude, pattern of living, or desire to be treated as an adult;
(7) Whether there are facilities or programs available to the judge of the juvenile division of circuit court which are likely to rehabilitate the juvenile prior to the expiration of the juvenile division of circuit court's jurisdiction;
(8) Whether the juvenile acted alone or was part of a group in the commission of the alleged offense;
(9) Written reports and other materials relating to the juvenile's mental, physical, educational, and social history; and
(10) Any other factors deemed relevant by the court. Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-318(g) (Repl. 2002).
The circuit court's order shall include written findings, see Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-318(g), but the court is not required to make findings on all ten of the statutory factors. See Beulah v. State, 344 Ark. 528, 42 S.W.3d 466 (2001). The serious and violent nature of the offense may be entitled to great weight in the court's analysis. See Ray v. State, 65 Ark. App. 209, 987 S.W.2d 738 (1999).
Upon a finding by clear and convincing evidence that a juvenile should be tried as an adult, the court shall enter an order to that effect. Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-318(h) (Repl. 2002). Clear and convincing evidence is that degree of proof that will produce in the trier of fact a firm conviction as to the allegations sought to be established. McClure v. State, 328 Ark. 35, 942 S.W.2d 243 (1997). The circuit court's decision on whether to transfer the case to juvenile court will not be reversed unless the decision is clearly erroneous. Beulah, supra. The State charged appellant with purposeful first-degree murder. Officer Calvin Martin testified at the he
Page 1 2 Arkansas Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|