Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

In re United States Currency in the Amount of 26

12/21/2000

dibility. On the other hand, the state produced not only the evidence described above, but, through the expert testimony of an experienced narcotics investigator, related the evidence to known patterns of drug tr afficking between Tucson and New York, explained that use of fictitious senders and elaborately packaged cash were hallmarks of "drug money," and established that this was the Gilberts' third time defending a forfeiture of a large amount of undocumented cash under allegations of drug trafficking.


Further more, by Gilbert's own admission, at least $5,000 of the seized " return of investment" was directly related to her husband's 1991 marijuana trafficking because it was allegedly concealed in her underwear dr awer at the time the marijuana and previously forfeited cash were seized from her home. Cf. United States v. $93,685 in U. S. Currency, 730 F. 2d 571 (9th Cir. 1984) (large amount of cash found in household where drug paraphernalia discovered, together with absence of evidence of legitimate sources, was cir cumstantial evidence of occupant's drug trafficking and tr ial court err ed in denying forfeiture).


Although the state's case was "thin" and, ar guably, less than well investigated, it requires no "combing of the record" to see that the state circumstantially established that it was more likely than not that the shipment of cash to Gilbert was related to some form of drug dealing between the Gilberts in Tucson and one or mor e individuals in New York. The only evidence to the contrary was a series of after-the-fact statements by Gilbert, which were either blatant falsehoods or too equivocal to bear any plausibility. Under the totality of the circumstances, there was simply no "substantial evidence" to support the trial court's r uling and I would find it clearly erroneous.


PHILIP G. ESPINOSA, Chief Judge






Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 

Arizona Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE