 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Ceselka v. Kingsborough Community College3/22/2001
ounded.
As a final point on this issue, we note that two objective medical tests (i.e., the MRI and an EMG study) performed on claimant did not support her claim that she suffered from a permanent disability and the only proof to contradict these tests consisted of subjective complaints reported by claimant to her physician. In our view, this provides further support for the conclusion that any error in denying access to these notes does not warrant reversal of the Board's determination. In sum, claimant has failed to demonstrate that the denial of access to these notes harmed her in any appreciable way under these circumstances (see generally, Matter of Denis v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N.Y., 192 AD2d 963, 967; Matter of Amarnick v Sobol, 173 AD2d 914, 916).
Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
|