 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Kohoutek v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice5/4/2000
dress the plea and continued questioning appellant. When asked by the trial court whether he had any idea how much money he wanted from the TDCJ for his claim, appellant replied "I don't want to make any more comments until I have a lawyer." The trial court again did not address this request, and continued questioning appellant on the merits of his claim.
Appellant, however, has afforded us no argument supporting a finding that his case represents such an exception. See Pedraza v. Crossroads Sec. Systems, 960 S.W.2d 339, 341 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1997, no writ). Moreover, appellant's failure to request appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to rules of civil procedure 296 and 297 leaves us unable to reach this conclusion ourselves. We overrule appellant's third point of error.
We reverse the judgment dismissing appellant's case for want of prosecution, and we remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
Page 1 2 3 Texas Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|