 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Vuyancih v. Bond Chiropractic Center6/24/1999
ht of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses. It may believe or disbelieve any witness or accept part of what a witness says and reject the rest.' * Thus the function of the expert who gives opinion testimony in order to aid the jury in reaching a just determination is entirely separate from the function of the jury which must assess credibility and settle controverted issues of fact. McKay Mach. Co. v. Rodman (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 77, 82.
Because there existed competent, credible evidence to support the jury's verdict, the trial court properly denied Vuyancih's motion for a new trial. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellees recover of appellant their costs herein taxed.
The Court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this Court directing the Common Pleas Court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Exceptions.
TIMOTHY E. McMONAGLE, P.J., and JOHN T. PATTON, J., CONCUR.
PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON JUDGE
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ohio Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|