Lamica v. Pecore (N.Y.App.Div. 06/22/2000)

[1]

Supreme Court6/22/2000 claims on behalf of the child, which defendant concedes, this subdivision bars reduction of plaintiffs' derivative claim for loss of their child's services because such claims are within the definition of "personal injury" (see, General Construction Law § 37-a; Psota v. Long Is. R.R. Corp., 246 NY 388, 395). Accordingly, Supreme Court properly dismissed the counterclaim. Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Page 1 2 

New York Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers