 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Holland v. City of Geddes5/31/2000
tinual ill effects from an original violation'"); Ward v. Caulk, 650 F2d 1144, 1147 (9thCir 1981) (citing Collins v. United Airlines, Inc., 514 F2d 594, 596 (9thCir 1975) (stating that " continuing violation is occasioned by continual unlawful acts, not by continual ill effects from an original violation"); Hyon Waste Management Servs. v. City of Chicago, 574 NE2d 129, 132 (IllAppCt 1991) (citation omitted) (stating that " continuing violation, however, is occasioned by continuing unlawful acts and conduct, not by continual ill effects from an initial violation").
[ ] This case, no matter which way you cut it, deals with the continual ill effects of the single act which the plaintiffs acknowledged under oath. No question but that the plaintiffs were aware and failed to give timely notice. I would affirm the trial court.
|