 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Drozdowski v. Chilson6/1/2000
assuming he was negligent, would not be responsible for anxiety caused by events other than his medical procedure.
(3) Finally, and most significantly, assuming there was error, it was harmless because the jury found in favor of Dr. Chilson and never reached the questions of proximate cause or damages. Kimball v. Otis Elevator Co., 89 Wn. App. 169, 174-75, 947 P.2d 1275 (1997).
We affirm the judgment in favor of Dr. Chilson.
A majority of the panel has determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
Sweeney, J.
WE CONCUR:
Brown, A.C.J.
Schultheis, J.
|