 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
In re Appeal of Fay12/8/2003
ck injury, see Demeritt, 142 N.H. at 810, and he proffered only his own uncorroborated testimony, we cannot conclude that Fay demonstrated, by a clear preponderance of the evidence, that the board's decision was unjust or unreasonable, see CNA Ins. Co., 148 N.H. at 319. Thus, we will not disturb the board's decision that Fay failed to meet his burden of proof that his gastrointestinal treatments were a result of his back injury.
Vacated in part and affirmed in part.
BROCK, C.J., and NADEAU and DALIANIS, JJ., concurred.
|