Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

McGee v. McGee

3/12/1999

is also undisputably present. The grant or denial of a Rule 60(b) motion is a final judgment, despite a pending appeal. Therefore, entry of Rule 60(b) relief was a final judgment.


The critical question is whether the Rule 60(b) motion and the tort action addressed identical issues. By filing her Rule 60(b) motion, Debra re-opened the property distribution agreement and litigated the question of her right to the quota shares. But the issue of whether Ken intentionally misrepresented his ownership of the boat was not litigated or decided in the Rule 60(b) proceeding. The superior court predicated Rule 60(b) relief solely on the property settlement, rather than on Ken's alleged misconduct.


We therefore conclude that Debra is collaterally estopped from re-litigating her right to the quota shares, but that it was error to dismiss her entire tort action. Still outstanding is the issue of whether Ken's conduct was sufficiently outrageous to permit punitive damages; if it was, the amount of any punitive damages award is also in issue. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.


4. Attorney's fees


Because we have reversed the dismissal of Debra's tort suit, and because Debra is precluded from relitigating only one issue -- her right to the quota shares -- in the tort suit, Ken is no longer the prevailing party in the tort suit. It is therefore necessary to vacate Ken's attorney's fees award.


IV. CONCLUSION


Because the superior court properly granted Debra's Rule 60(b)(6) motion, we AFFIRM in Case No. S-7966.


Because the Rule 60(b) proceeding resolved only one issue -- Debra's entitlement to the quota shares -- raised in the tort suit, we REVERSE the judgment in Case No. S-7965, VACATE the attorney's fees award, and REMAND for further proceedings.






Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Alaska Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE