Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

People v. McKeller

6/17/2003

kely that that officer would have wanted a statement that actually corroborated the victim's story. Accordingly, we are not persuaded that the trial court clearly erred in resolving the credibility question in the interrogating officer's favor. People v Attebury, 463 Mich 662, 668; 624 NW2d 912 (2001). Consequently, we reject defendant's contention that the trial court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress the written statement. Id.


Defendant also contends that his sentences were unconstitutional as "cruel and unusual" punishments, US Const Amend VIII, or "cruel or unusual" punishments, Const 1963, art 1, ยง 16. Specifically, defendant contends that the trial court did not consider his "rehabilitative potential." However, in light of defendant's criminal history and multiple parole violations, we are not persuaded that defendant's sentence was cruel or unusual. People v Poole, 218 Mich App 702, 715; 555 NW2d 485 (1996); see also People v Nunez, 242 Mich App 610, 618 n 2; 619 NW2d 550 (2000) (recognizing that a punishment that "passes muster" under our state constitution necessarily passes muster under the federal constitution).


Moreover, we note that defendant was sentenced within the appropriate Legislative sentencing guideline range. Thus, because defendant is not contending there was a scoring error or that inaccurate information was relied on in determining his sentence, we must affirm the trial court's sentence. MCL 769.34(10). Finally, the trial court did not sentence defendant to a longer term than that provided by the appropriate sentencing guidelines range; accordingly, MCL 769.34(7) did not mandate that the trial court provide an "advice-of-rights" instruction. Consequently, we reject defendant's challenges to his sentences.


Affirmed.


Donald S. Owens


Richard A. Bandstra


Christopher M. Murray






Page 1 2 

Michigan Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE