 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Excell Construction6/19/2003
he liability portion of its claims for professional malpractice, gross negligence, and tortious interference. We disagree. Because plaintiff's professional malpractice claim and gross negligence claim are barred, the trial court properly denied plaintiff's motion for summary disposition concerning Counts I and II of plaintiff's complaint. Regarding plaintiff's tortious interference claim, plaintiff fails to argue that the trial court improperly granted summary disposition to defendant on this issue. Additionally, plaintiff fails to provide any legal or factual support for its claim that defendant tortiously interfered with its contract, other than a conclusory statement that summary disposition is appropriate because summary disposition in defendant's favor on counts I and II was inappropriate. This Court will not search for authority to support plaintiff's position, Staff v Marder, 242 Mich App 521, 529; 619 NW2d 57 (2000).
Affirmed.
Jane E. Markey
Henry William Saad
Kurtis T. Wilder
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Michigan Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|