 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Watkins v. Eighth Dist. Court of Appeals8/5/1998
cable. The statute broadly refers to "all proceedings in which an insolvent insurer * * * is obligated to defend a party." The Eighth Appellate District followed this directive.
The majority need not construe R.C. 3955.19 when its meaning is clear from its plain language. PIE is an insolvent insurer. PIE is obligated to defend the Cleveland Clinic in the Watkins litigation. Therefore, the action must be stayed in accordance with R.C. 3955.19. I respectfully Dissent and would deny the writ.
Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing Dissenting opinion.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 Ohio Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|