 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Schwartz v. Osiatynski12/18/1997
ue for our review and, accordingly, it is overruled.
Schwartz's fourth cross-assignment of error states:
IV. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN ONLY ORDERING APPELLANT TO PAY $76.50 PER MONTH ON AN ARREARAGE OF $5,077.27.
Schwartz argues the court abused its discretion when it established Osiatynski's arrearage repayment schedule.
Osiatynski does not address this assignment of error.
The issue for our review is whether the court abused its discretion in this regard.
Here, the record reflects that the court ordered Osiatynski to pay $5,077.22 arrearage at a rate of $76.50 per month. We recognize this amount of money may require a long period of time to repay, but cannot conclude, based upon this record, that the court abused its discretion. Accordingly, this cross-assignment of error is overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant its costs herein taxed.
The Court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this Court directing the Domestic Relations Court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
MATIA, P.J., and PORTER, J., CONCUR
JUDGE TERRENCE O'DONNELL
|