 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Guy v. Mitchell3/1/2002
e employee behavior standards required by the employer.
Under the facts and circumstances of this case, we must conclude that the trial court correctly found that the plaintiffs could not present evidence at trial to show that the intentional tort was committed within the course and scope of Mitchell's employment. Consequently, the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer was correct.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to the appellants, Kathy and William Guy.
AFFIRMED
|