 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Schmidt v. Koval3/26/2002
s during trial do not prejudice a party's substantial rights, the errors cannot, "become prejudicial by sheer weight of the numbers." State v. Hill (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 195, 212. Appellant's fifth assignment of error is overruled.
. In his sixth and final assignment of error, Appellant argues,
. "THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY OVERRULED PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL PURSUANT TO OHIO CIVIL RULE 59."
. Appellant challenges generally the trial court's denial of his motion for a new trial. The arguments raised in that motion have been addressed individually and overruled in the aforementioned discussion. Thus, this assignment of error is also overruled.
. Having overruled Appellant's assignments of error in their entirety, this Court hereby affirms the judgment entered by the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas.
Vukovich, P.J., concurs.
DeGenaro, J., concurs in judgment only.
|