Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Johnson v. Montgomery

8/28/2001

1 N.W.2d 259, 262-63 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Apr. 17, 2001). At a minimum, the affidavit


must disclose "specific details concerning their experts' expected testimony, including the applicable standard of care, the acts or omissions that plaintiffs allege violated the standard of care and an outline of the chain of causation" between the violation of the standard of care and the plaintiff's damages. Lindberg, 599 N.W.2d at 572 (quoting Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Med. Ctr., 457 N.W.2d 188, 193 (Minn. 1990)).


In this case, the district court ruled that the affidavit failed to clearly set forth the acts or omissions that violated the standard of care. The district court noted that the affidavit appears to set forth the applicable standard of care as follows: "It is incumbent upon the surgeon to be familiar with a patient's past medical history and its relevance to the procedure planned." But the district court observed that nowhere does the affidavit disclose the acts or omissions that violate this standard of care. Rather, the affidavit ignores the undisputed facts that prior to surgery Dr. Montgomery ordered and reviewed the pre-operative physical and history.


Our review of the affidavit reveals no error in the district court's analysis. The affidavit states that Dr. Montgomery did not properly evaluate Johnson prior to surgery and that a proper evaluation would have included an investigation into Johnson's medical history. The affidavit further states that a proper pre-operative evaluation would have disclosed that the risks in performing the procedure may have outweighed the benefits Johnson stood to gain from the procedure. But there was a pre-operative physical and history performed, which was evaluated by Dr. Montgomery prior to surgery. The affidavit is devoid of any specific acts or omissions that violated the given standard of care. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing this action pursuant to Minn. Stat. ยง 145.682.


Affirmed.






Page 1 2 

Minnesota Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE