 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Ryder Driver Leasing8/27/2001
's award in this respect.
Finally, as to the employer's argument that the trial judge erred in failing to grant a continuance, we find no showing of prejudice on the record; therefore, the argument is overruled.
The costs of this appeal are taxed to the employer.
JUDGMENT
FILED: AUGUST 27, 2001
This case is before the Court upon Ryder Driver Leasing , Inc.'s motion for review pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. ยง 50-6-225(e)(5)(B), the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference;
Whereupon, it appears to the Court that the motion for review is not well taken and should be denied; and
It is, therefore, ordered that the Panel's findings of fact and conclusions of law are adopted and affirmed, and the decision of the Panel is made the judgment of the Court.
Costs will be paid by Ryder Driver Leasing , Inc., for which execution may issue if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
|