 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.8/23/2001
t and third points of error.
In her second point of error, Jackson claims that HL&P;"substantially relies on the affidavit and oral deposition of William Grimes, who is an employee of HL&P; and that "conflicting inferences may be drawn" from Grimes's affidavit and deposition testimony "precluding the granting of a no-evidence summary judgment." This testimony complained of in Jackson's brief does not relate to HL&P;s no-evidence argument. Rather, Grimes's testimony was offered to support HL&P;s claim that it owed no duty to Jackson as a matter of law, and it does not preclude a no-evidence summary judgment in this case.
Accordingly, we overrule her second point of error.
We affirm the judgment.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 Texas Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|