Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

In re Marriage of Brown

7/30/2001

lling in division of property between the parties in a dissolution proceeding, but 'the court must have in mind the correct character and status of the property . . . before any theory of division is ordered.'' In re Marriage of Brewer, 137 Wn.2d at 766 (quoting Blood v. Blood, 69 Wn.2d 680, 682, 419 P.2d 1006 (1966)).


'{T}ort damages which compensate for services or earnings lost by the community, or for expenses incurred by the community during the injury , would be community property; but tort damages which compensate for pain and suffering to the injured party and injury-related expenses after dissolution of the marriage would be separate property.' In re Marriage of Brewer, 137 Wn.2d at 767-68.


The record here establishes that Michael received $10,000 for his personal injuries. Michael offers no evidence in the record before us to indicate what percentage of the settlement was given for his pain and suffering and, therefore, would be separate property. Absent proof to the contrary, Washington presumes monies received during marriage are community property. We conclude that the court did not err by considering the Porsche as community property.


Finally, Michael claims that the court should have given him 'credit' for paying the monthly mortgage payments after Michelle moved out of the family home. He fails to cite any legal authority for this proposition. This court need not consider arguments unsupported by legal authority. In re Marriage of Lindemann, 92 Wn. App. 64, 78, 960 P.2d 966 (1998).


Accordingly, we reject his contention.


Michelle seeks attorney fees in this appeal under RAP 18.9 and RCW 26.09.140. The trial court awarded her fees below. She is the prevailing party in this appeal. Michael has violated the Rules of Appellate Procedure by raising issues without assigning error to factual issues, by not supporting argument with legal authority, and by making frivolous claims not supported by the record. Accordingly, we grant her request for fees.


We affirm the decree of dissolution.




Page 1 2 

Washington Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE