Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Beard v. City of Danville Public Works

4/30/1996

the surgery. Mr. Feinman moved for reconsideration. On April 11, 1995, the commission again affirmed the deputy commissioner's decision, finding that although the medical bills were contested, they were not determined by the commission to be reasonable and necessary, as required by Code § 65.2-714.


Mr. Feinman filed a second motion for reconsideration. The commission denied the motion, holding that Code § 65.2-714 requires attorney's fees when benefits for medical services are awarded after a hearing on the claim or after abandonment of a defense, but that the medical bills in this case were not approved as a result of dispute and litigation and were not before the commission on an initial disputed claim. The commission also found that CRMS had not abandoned a defense because it had not contested payment.


The commission did not err in holding that Mr. Feinman was not entitled to attorney's fees under Code § 65.2-714.


Virginia Code Ann. § 65.2-714 (B) provides:


If a contested claim is held to be compensable under this title and, after a hearing on the claim on its merits or after abandonment of a defense by the employer or insurance carrier, benefits for medical services are awarded and inure to the benefit of a third party . . . health care provider, the Commission shall award to the employee's attorney a reasonable fee and other reasonable pro rata costs as are appropriate from the sum which benefits the thirty party . . . health care provider.


Credible evidence in the record establishes the following: The claim was accepted by CRMS as compensable from its inception. Neither the City of Danville nor CRMS asserted or abandoned a defense. They sought only clarifying information, which Beard and Mr. Feinman denied. The health care providers gained no benefit from Mr. Feinman's involvement in the matter.


The decision of the commission is affirmed.


Affirmed.






Page 1 2 

Virginia Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE