 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Rollin v. Frankel3/23/2000
See DeMont v. DeFrantz, 303 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 10, (Ct. App. August 27, 1999), review granted, (Ariz. Feb. 8, 2000) (No. CV-99-0366-PR) (plaintiff made prima facie showing that nonresident defendant "knew her [allegedly defamatory] statements . . . would injure [the plaintiff] and knew he would feel the effects of that injury in Arizona"); Williams v. Lakeview Co., ___ Ariz. ___, , 990 P.2d 669, (App. 1999), review granted, (Ariz. Jan. 4, 2000) (No. CV-99-0364-PR) (nonresident casino purposefully and voluntarily contacted Arizona through advertising in monthly newspaper and mailing between fifty and one hundred brochures to Arizona tour bus companies offering commissions to operators based on time parked at casino); MacPherson, 158 Ariz. at 312, 762 P.2d at 599 ("no doubt that [nonresident defendant] was soliciting business in Arizona"). None of those cases supports a finding of specific jurisdiction here. Because plaintiffs failed to show that Frankel or HTM purposefully established minimum contacts in Arizona out of which plaintiffs' claims arise, the "constitutional touchstone" for personal jurisdiction, Burger King, 471 U.S. at 474, 105 S. Ct. at 2183, 85 L. Ed. 2d at 542, the trial court properly dismissed the action.
Affirmed.
JOHN PELANDER, Presiding Judge
CONCURRING:
WILLIAM E. DRUKE, Judge
M. JAN FLÓREZ, Judge
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Arizona Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|