 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Opperman v. Pruisner3/15/2000
ard under the circumstances of this case.
The Oppermans articulated compelling policy reasons for delaying suit against their underinsurance carrier. However, they did not contend, either before the district court or in their appeal briefs that the contract language is adhesive and should be written out of the contract for this reason. Therefore we are unwilling to override the unambiguous language of their policy. We accordingly affirm the district court's conclusion that:
Under the policy in force at the time of the accident Oppermans were required to bring the UIM action against Allied within two years after . . December 18, 1995. Because they did not do so, their claim against Allied is barred by the policy terms.
AFFIRMED.
|