 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Peterson v. Wells Fargo Armored Services Corp.3/20/2000
In an argument that would avoid the problems engendered by the provision of conflicting information, Wells Fargo additionally contends that if Peterson did not have actual knowledge of the compensation insurance, she was at least on notice such that she should inquire further. The record, however, shows that Plaintiff did inquire further, but that Wells Fargo resisted her efforts to obtain a copy of the insurance policy. When Wells Fargo finally provided a copy for Plaintiff's inspection, it was an incomplete copy. We therefore find no merit in Wells Fargo's argument.
Conclusion
We reverse the order granting summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo and remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
RUDY S. APODACA, Judge
RICHARD C. BOSSON, Judge
|