Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Cecere v. Peters (N.Y.App.Div. 03/07/2000)

[1]      Supreme Court3/7/2000
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice Bowman, J.), entered December 17, 1998, which granted defendants' motion and cross motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 for failure to prosecute, unanimously affirmed, without costs.


Plaintiff's claim that defendants' 90-day notice was defective pursuant to CPLR 3216(b)(3) because it was not sent by registered or certified mail was not raised in the motion court and, accordingly, is not preserved for our review. Were we to consider it, we would find that any noncompliance by defendants with the statutorily prescribed form of mailing was without prejudice to plaintiff, who received the notices. Defendants' nonconforming mailing amounted to no more than a procedural irregularity and, as such, did not constitute a jurisdictional impediment to defendants' ensuing motions to dismiss for failure to prosecute (Balancio v. Am. Optical Corp., 66 NY2d 750, 751; Beermont Corp. v. Yager, 34 AD2d 589). Although plaintiff alleges that defendants contributed to the delay in the action's prosecution by not responding to her attempts to stipulate to the notice of medical malpractice nunc pro tunc, the record shows that plaintiff waited almost 2 1/2 years to take any action to prosecute the lawsuit and, indeed, that no action was taken until defendants moved to dismiss for plaintiff's failure to respond to their 90-day notices. Moreover, the action finally taken by plaintiff was not to file a note of issue or to seek to avert her impending default for failing to timely file a note of issue (see Levin v. Levin, 256 AD2d 447). Thus, " n view of plaintiff's persistent neglect despite repeated opportunities to resume prosecution of the action and the absence of any timely proffered reasonable excuse for the extensive delay" (Baczkowski v D.A. Collins Constr. Co., Inc., 89 NY2d 499, 503), the complaint was properly dismissed.


THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


ENTERED: MARCH 7, 2000




Page 1 

New York Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE