Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

In re Estate of Johnson

5/28/1998

ssets to which they were not parties and in which they have no present interest. Dispositive of this issue is the court's determination in Ohio Contract Carriers Assn., Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm. of Ohio (1942), 140 Ohio St. 160, where the court, citing 2 Am. Jur. 941, Section 149, stated at 161:


It is a fundamental rule that to be entitled to institute appeal or error proceedings a person must have a present interest in the subject-matter of the litigation and must be aggrieved or prejudiced by the judgment, order or decree.


Similarly, in considering whether a Guardian had a right of appeal from a probate court determination that the ward had been restored to reason, the court stated that, the guardian is not an interested party whose rights are affected by the decision of the probate court, nor is she an aggrieved party under such order. See In re Guardianship of Love (1969), 19 Ohio St.2d 111 at 115. See also DomesticViolence Network v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 438.


The record before us demonstrates that appellants clearly were not parties to the action in the probate court, nor did any of them have a present interest in the subject matter of that litigation, nor did they demonstrate they were aggrieved parties under the probate court order.


Accordingly, we have concluded these appellants lack standing to appeal from the May 30, 1997 order of the probate court, as they were not parties to that litigation, had no present interest in its subject matter, and have failed to show they are aggrieved by it in any fashion. For these reasons, we dismiss this appeal and we need not reach the other issues presented.


Appeal dismissed.


It is ordered that appellee recover of appellants costs herein taxed.


A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.


PATRICIA A. BLACKMON, A.J., JAMES M. PORTER, J., CONCUR


TERRENCE O'DONNELL JUDGE




Page 1 2 

Ohio Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE