 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Lyons v. J.A. Auger6/12/2002
the path of Mr. Brown's 18-wheeler.
A review of the record reveals that the trial judge was thoughtful and reasoned the entire time of the trial, and that there is nothing in his trial demeanor or his reasons for judgment to suggest that he did not consider all of the evidence. After consideration of both sides' theories, he found the defendant's argument more consistent with the physical evidence and testimony in the case. It is plausible that Mr. Brown's statements to the investigating officers are not inconsistent with his deposition testimony because he was not certain that Ms. Allen's car was the same car he had seen approaching him from behind on the day of the accident. Furthermore, Mr. Brown consistently denied leaving the inside lane of travel and fault for the accident.
Upon a thorough review of this record we cannot find the trial court's ruling manifestly erroneous or unreasonable. Conclusion
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to the plaintiffs.
AFFIRMED.
|