 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Tauro Brothers Trucking Co.6/7/2002
garding insurance policies.
An exclusion of employer intentional torts from insurance coverage is effective when the exclusionary language is clear and unambiguous. Moore v. Cardinal Packaging, Inc. (2000), 136 Ohio App.3d 101, 106; Lakota v. Westfield Ins. Co. (1998), 132 Ohio App.3d 138. In the instant case, upon reading the Ohio Liability Coverage Enhancement, it is clear that employer intentional torts are specifically excluded from coverage by the terms of the policy. Thus, appellee does not have a duty to defend or indemnify appellant in the underlying cause of action alleging an employer intentional tort. Appellant's sole assignment of error lacks merit.
Based on the foregoing, the judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.
JUDITH A. CHRISTLEY, P.J., DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., concur.
|