Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Reddick v. Murray

9/19/2001

ngham v. Shelton Sec. Service, Inc., ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tenn. 2001).


From our independent examination of the evidence, we find no explanation for the claimant's acutely herniated disk, other than hers that it occurred at work while she was cleaning up her work area. She told Dr. Barnett it happened at work. Her uncontradicted testimony is supported by the uncontradicted testimony of Ms. Cole and the claimant's husband. Perhaps the four witnesses who were waiting in the wings when the trial court took the case under advisement and adjourned court at the conclusion of the plaintiff's case would have offered countervailing evidence, in which case there would have been other evidence against which the testimony of the claimant and her corroborating witnesses could have been weighed and evaluated. At this point, however, there is none. A worker's compensation claimant's uncontradicted testimony as to causation, supported by the opinion of a qualified medical expert, should not be ignored because of inconsistencies in her testimony concerning extraneous matters. A prima facie case was made out.


For the above reasons, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded to the Chancery Court for Madison County for full trial of the issues raised by the pleadings. Costs are taxed to the appellee, Murray, Inc.


ORDER


This case is before the Court upon motion for review pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. ยง 50-6-225(e)(5)(B), the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference;


Whereupon, it appears to the Court that the motion for review is not well-taken and should be denied and


It is, therefore, ordered that the Panel's findings of fact and conclusions of law are adopted and affirmed, and the decision of the Panel is made the judgment of the Court.


Costs on appeal are taxed to Murray, Inc.


IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2001.


PER CURIAM


Holder, J. - Not participating.






Page 1 2 3 

Tennessee Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE