 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Bailey v. Huggins Diagnostic & Rehabilitation Center Inc.6/26/1997
d us to conclude that Huggins here owed no duty of due care was implicated by the circumstances disclosed in Bloskas.
We conclude, therefore, that the trial court's submission of plaintiff's claims for negligent misrepresentation against Huggins and the Center to the jury was error and that its resulting judgment must be reversed.
The judgment against Huggins and the Center, based upon plaintiff's claim against them for negligent misrepresentation, is reversed.
JUDGE METZGER and JUDGE MARQUEZ concur.
|