 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Warner v. William Marsh Uninsured Employer''s Fund6/10/1997
Argued by Teleconference
MEMORANDUM OPINION *
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
The Uninsured Employer's Fund and John Warner each appeal the decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission awarding benefits to William Marsh for injuries by accident to his back and shoulder. The Fund appeals the compensability of the shoulder injury and further contends that the commission erred in entering the award against the general contractor as a corporation instead of as an individual. John Warner, Marsh's direct employer and a subcontractor, also appeals the compensability of the shoulder injury, as well as the back injury. We affirm the decision of the commission as to compensation, but remand with instructions to vacate the award against the general contractor as a corporation and enter it against the general contractor as an individual.
The parties are fully conversant with the record in the cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary.
Both the Fund and John Warner claim that the commission erred in finding that Marsh's shoulder injury was a compensable injury by accident. Guided by well established principles, we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the party prevailing below. See Crisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge, Inc., 1 Va. App. 503, 504, 339 S.E.2d 916, 916 (1986). "If there is evidence, or reasonable inferences can be drawn from the evidence, to support the Commission's findings, they will not be disturbed on review, even though there is evidence in the record to support a contrary finding." Morris v. Badger Powhatan/Figgie Int'l, Inc., 3 Va. App. 276, 279, 348 S.E.2d 876, 877 (1986); see Code ยง 65.2-706. "In determining whether credible evidence exists," this Court will not "retry the facts, reweigh the preponderance of the evidence, or make its own determination of the credibility of the witnesses." Wagner Enters., Inc. v. Brooks, 12 Va. App. 890, 894, 407 S.E.2d 32, 35 (1991) (citation omitted).
The record contains evidence that Marsh's shoulder, although previously injured, underwent a significant structural change as a result of the incident in question. Marsh's treating physician, in his notes, letters, and interrogatories, opined that the incident caused the change in his shoulder and necessitated surgery. The physician also made a seemingly inconsistent opinion, but this represents at best an internal conflict of an expert that was resolved by the commission in favor of the claimant. That determination is supported by credible evidence and is binding and conclusive on appeal. See Greif Cos./Genesco, Inc. v. Hensley, 22 Va. App. 546, 552, 471 S.E.2d 803, 806 (1996).
We agree with the Fund's second contention that the commission entered the award against an incorrect employer. As general contractor on the construction site, both P.D. Gravett as an individual and P.D. Gravett Management Services were before the commission as defendants. The commission's file indicated that P.D. Gravett Management Services had been terminated as a corporation six months before the accident. The owner of the property stated that P.D. Gravett was a general contractor retained as an independent contractor to supervise the building of residential houses.
"It is well established that any actions performed by the directors or officers after dissolution, if not related to the process of winding up the corporation's affairs, should be deemed individual actions, with concomitant individual liability therefor. If an entity is no corporation at all, the individuals who conduct its affairs must be personally liable for their ac
Page 1 2 Virginia Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|