Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Success Stories of Personal Injury Lawyers Directory US Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Canada Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Personal Injury Lawyers Resource Directory
Search Lawyers by Zip Code
facebook.com/injury.usa

  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Akers v. Miller

12/28/1998

mmatory." (Italics added.)


Furthermore, we have reviewed the excluded autopsy photographs in the context of the evidence and testimony adduced at trial. The error (if any) was harmless because it is not reasonably probable a jury that maintained its objectivity would have reached a different result had the photographs been admitted. (Beyda v. City of Los Angeles (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 511, 516; Evid. Code, § 354; Cal. Const., art. VI, § 13.) The trial turned on whether the bedsore was irremediable. As one defense doctor testified, "My opinion is that, given this entire complex of her chronic illnesse[s,] her debilitated state, which we've gone over, her bedridden state, her ulcers in my opinion could not be healed."


The jury heard conflicting expert evidence on this issue, and decided for the defense. The admission or rejection of the autopsy photographs would not have made any difference. There was no miscarriage of Justice.


III.


Akers argues more relaxed rules of admissibility should apply in elder abuse cases because, as the Legislature has declared, "few civil cases are brought in connection with this abuse due to problems of proof . . . ." (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 15600, subd. (h).) Yet the same legislation adopted a higher standard of fault (recklessness) and a heavier burden of proof (clear and convincing evidence) before enhanced damages like attorney fees may be imposed. Ultimately, as one court concluded, " he statutes in issue here . . . do not make a `substantial change in this state's traditional tort law doctrine ' . . . ." (ARA Living Centers - Pacific, Inc., supra, 18 Cal.App.4th at p. 1561.)


In short, we do not find any legislative intent to reduce the trial court's discretion under Evidence Code section 352 to admit or exclude evidence based on its probative value and prejudicial effect.


Judgment affirmed. Costs on appeal are awarded to defendant.


CROSBY, ACTING P.J.


WE CONCUR:


RYLAARSDAM, J.


BEDSWORTH, J.






Page 1 2 3 

California Personal Injury Attorneys    Personal Injury Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.

Personal Injury Lawyers Brain Injuries Spinal Cord Injuries
Quadriplegia and Paraplegia Back Injuries Ruptured & Herniated Disks
Bulging Disk Neck Injuries Dog Bites
Toxic Mold Product Liability Fire Accidents
Trucking Accidents Boating Accidents Car Accidents
Plane Crashes Medical Malpractice Motorcycle Accidents
Wrongful Death Personal Injury Lawsuits Testimonial
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites
DUI Defense  |  SiteMap  | PI Blog  | Trading Partners | Attorney Registration  | PI Case Laws  | FAQ | Personal Injury Forum
 | Personal Injury Lawyers Directory  | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2005. “National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (NAPIL)”. All rights reserved.
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE