 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
VAN HOUTEN v. HARCO CONST.2/27/1995
pulated in the consent decrees that it was Van Houten's employer at the time of the injury and that the petition against Harnum may be treated as a petition against Harco, it is not unfair to apply collateral estoppel to bar Harco from relitigating factual issues decided in the prior proceeding against Harnum. See Crawford, 561 A.2d at 1028-29.
Harco contends that the issue of whether Van Houten suffered a work-related
Because the issue of whether Van Houten suffered a work-related
The entry is:
The decision of the Workers' Compensation Board is vacated. Remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion herein.
All concurring.
|