 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Digliani v. City of Fort Collins8/19/1993
t.
Moreover, plaintiffs may not circumvent the exclusivity doctrine by framing their claims as breach of contract, breach of implied contract, or promissory estoppel. See Brown v. City of Colorado Springs, 749 P.2d 475 (Colo. App. 1987). Thus, we conclude that the trial court did not err in its dismissal of these claims based upon the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act.
III.
Finally, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in its dismissal of their claims as barred by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. Because of our Disposition in Part II, we do not address this issue.
Judgment affirmed.
JUDGE PIERCE and JUDGE MARQUEZ concur.
Disposition
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
|