 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Lester v. Performance Buick Pontiac Inc.8/10/1993
Per Curiam
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the commission erred in finding that Charles Edgar Lester ("Lester") failed to prove that his back injury and subsequent medical treatment were caused by his industrial accident of November 15, 1991. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission ("commission"). Rule 5A:27.
"The actual determination of causation is a factual finding that will not be disturbed on appeal if there is credible evidence to support the finding." Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Musick, 7 Va. App. 684, 688, 376 S.E.2d 814, 817 (1989). The existence of contrary evidence in the record is of no consequence if there is credible evidence to support the commission's finding. Wagner Enters., Inc. v. Brooks, 12 Va. App. 890, 894, 407 S.E.2d 32, 35 (1991). On appeal, we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the party prevailing below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). Unless we can say as a matter of law that Lester's evidence was sufficient to sustain his burden of proof, then the commission's finding is binding and conclusive upon us. Tomko v. Michael's Plastering Co., 210 Va. 697, 699, 173 S.E.2d 833, 835 (1970).
Lester has been employed as an automobile salesman by Performance Buick Pontiac, Inc. ("Performance Buick") since September 1991. Lester stated that on November 15, 1991, he injured his lower back while demonstrating the use of a jack to one of his customers, William Pittman. Lester testified that when he went to pull the jack free, it came out suddenly, and he felt a sharp pain in his back. Pittman testified, however, that when Lester assisted him with the jack, he made no mention of hurting his back and walked away normally to help another customer.
After the November 15, 1991 incident, Lester continued to work for three more weeks. During this time, he brought ice packs to work and placed them on his lower back. On December 10th or 11th, 1991, Lester was in his office and bent over to get a form out of his desk drawer when he experienced severe pain in his lower back. He immediately sought medical attention.
The medical records reveal that Lester had been treated by a chiropractor, Dr. Catherine Sears, since March 5, 1990 for lower back pain which had begun a year earlier. Dr. Sears' treatment involved the L4 and L5 areas of the back. On October 28, 1991, Lester returned to Dr. Sears complaining of low back pain that had developed over two weeks. It was noted that one week before this visit Lester had lifted an organ. On November 30, 1991, Lester was treated by Dr. Sears. However, Lester made no mention of the November 15, 1991 jack incident to Dr. Sears, although Dr. Sears did note lower back pain.
When Lester began treatment with Dr. W. Donald Floyd on December 11, 1991, he told Dr. Floyd of the November 15, 1991 and December 10, 1991 incidents. However, Lester inaccurately told Dr. Floyd that he had been treated by Dr. Sears in 1990 and 1991 solely for problems related to his neck. Dr. Floyd diagnosed a lumbar spine strain.
Lester began treatment with neurosurgeon Alfred Magness on December 23, 1991. He told Dr. Magness that his pain "began on December 10, 1991 when he was leaning over to pick up a paper. There is no history of injury or accident otherwise." Dr. Magness ordered an MRI which revealed a ruptured disc at the L4-5 lev
Page 1 2 Virginia Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
By using the system, you agree to TERMS OF SERVICE
|