 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Elizabeth Las v. Yellow Front Stores Inc.3/9/1992
ce. More important, however, the pans were not in the exclusive control of Yellow Front Stores. Other customers could take out a pan and then replace it. Finally, while Las testifies that she does "not know what I could have done to cause the accident", her contribution to the accident remains a viable theory.
Neither res ipsa loquitur nor some reduced standard of care for self-service operations generates an issue of material fact. Summary judgment was proper.
Affirm.
Disposition
Holding that the proper standard of care was applied and that the plaintiff had failed to meet her burden of rebutting the motion for summary judgment, the court affirms the judgment.
Page 1 2 3 Washington Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|