 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.5/16/1991
ery against Cessna no matter how many theories they may advance. E.g., Marshall, 128 Ariz. at 513-14, 627 P.2d at 244-45. When a plaintiff brings a product liability action in negligence and strict liability, arising out of the same conduct, only one claim is presented for purposes of Rule 54(b).
Conclusion
The order dismissing Cessna from the strict liability count did not completely dispose of an entire claim and therefore was not final in spite of the certification under Rule 54(b). This court accordingly lacks jurisdiction to decide the merits of the appeal. See A.R.S. ยง 12-2101(B).
The appeal is dismissed and the matter is remanded to the superior court for further proceedings.
Page 1 2 3 4 Arizona Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|