 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Flint v. Town of Bernalillo6/16/1994
s, we believe the testimony was relevant and admissible. See ) (pretrial order controls the course of subsequent proceedings and is intended to eliminate unfair surprise). On remand the Judge should permit the introduction of relevant evidence from both parties concerning the issue of posting.
Conclusion
We reverse the Judge's determination that Claimant should have given notice to Employer at the time Claimant's problems first were interfering with his work, and we remand for further proceedings consistent with the matters set forth in this opinion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
THOMAS A. DONNELLY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
A. JOSEPH ALARID, Judge
BRUCE D. BLACK, Judge
|