 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Bell v. Mt Sinai Med. Ctr.6/13/1994
ahoga App. No. 57741, unreported, 1990 WL 204337; Waddell v. Fisher Foods, Inc. (Apr. 4, 1985), Cuyahoga App. No. 48895, unreported, 1985 WL 7939. Only if the circumstances are of such a reprehensible and heinous nature as to constitute prejudice, will this court reverse a judgment based upon closing argument. Kubiszak; Hitson; Plavcan v. Longo (July 3, 1980), Cuyahoga App. No. 39964, unreported.
In the within case, we do not characterize any of Jackson's statements as reprehensible or heinous and, consequently, do not find any prejudicial misconduct during counsel's closing argument. Even when we consider the other comments not objected to by appellant's counsel during Jackson's and Charms's closing argument, we fail to find the presence of improper statements which were so reprehensible and heinous as to constitute prejudice. Appellant's fourth assignment of error is overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
NUGENT and DYKE, JJ., concur.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ohio Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|