 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
PEAVEY v. TAYLOR2/3/1994
Walter Peavey appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J.) in favor of Richard Taylor individually and Taylor's Sporting Goods, China, Inc. (TSG), on Peavey's claim for personal injuries he received when he fell down a flight of stairs on the premises occupied by TSG. On appeal, Peavey contends that the court erred in ruling as a matter of law that (1) TSG was an employer enjoying the immunity afforded by the Workers' Compensation Act (Act), and (2) Taylor could not be held liable individually as the owner of the building in which the injury occurred. Because in the circumstance of this case, compensation was made to Peavey pursuant to a contract entered into by TSG with an employee management firm, TSG is entitled to the immunity afforded by the Act. Therefore, we affirm the judgment. A factual dispute remains, however, with respect to Taylor's liability as the landowner, and we therefore vacate the judgment in favor of Taylor and remand for further proceedings.
In April of 1990, TSG and Employee Staffing of America, Inc. (ESA), entered into a contract under which ESA assumed responsibility for all of TSG's employee management functions, including payroll and workers' compensation coverage. The contract provided that ESA would hire all of TSG's employees, including Richard Taylor and Peavey, and then lease them back to TSG. The contract further provided that the two companies would have joint supervision of the leased employees. On July 9, 1990, Peavey fell down a flight of stairs in a service building located on the premises occupied by TSG where he was employed as a "parts man." The fall resulted in an injury to Peavey's back that has prevented him from working.
Peavey filed a workers' compensation petition and began receiving payments approximately six weeks after the accident. These payments came from two sources. Initially, ESA's workers' compensation insurer, Travelers Insurance Company, paid Peavey's benefits until a dispute arose between ESA and Travelers; thereafter, ESA paid Peavey directly.
The Corporation, TSG, was formed prior to Peavey's injury. It is unclear from the record whether, when he formed TSG, Taylor transferred to it title to the service building where the accident occurred, or whether he continued to own it individually. While there is evidence indicating that Taylor has not collected rent for the building, nothing in the record indicates whether Taylor transferred title or dominion to TSG.
I.
Maine's Workers' Compensation Act provides that " n employer who has secured the payment of compensation in conformity with sections 21-A to 27 [of the Act] is exempt from civil actions . . . involving personal injuries sustained by an employee arising out of and in the course of employment, or for death resulting from those injuries." 39 M.R.S.A. § 4 (Supp. 1992). Peavey contends that TSG is not immune from this civil suit because TSG has not "secured the payment of compensation" within the meaning of section 4 of the Act. We disagree.
TSG has secured payment of compensation through its contract with ESA. The insurance policy secured by ESA was issued by an insurer approved by the Workers' Compensation Commission in the form approved by the Commission, and was in effect on the date of Peavey's injury. There is no question that Peavey's injury is work-related, and that he has been receiving benefits under the Act. Although Peavey's injury occurred prior to the enactment of the statute governing employee leasing, 32 M.R.S.A. § 14051-14058 (Supp. 1993), the arrangement between TSG and ESA under which ESA is obligated to procure the insurance is commonly used and is not unlawful. Ther
Page 1 2 3 Maine Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|