 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Missoula Cty. Sch. Dist. #1 v. Pacific Emp. Ins.12/28/1993
contemplation of either the insured or insurer that the referenced policy exclusion would be interpreted to allow such an absurd result. I do suspect, however, that there may be a few teachers in shaky relationships with their boards and administrations who should now begin looking over their shoulders.
For the foregoing reasons, I would reverse the District Court and hold that the contract exclusion bars the School District's claim.
JUSTICE GRAY concurs in the foregoing dissent.
JUSTICE WEBER concurs in the foregoing dissent with the exception that he does not concur in the last four paragraphs of the dissent with regard to the potential for mischief which may be generated by the Court's opinion.
|