 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
McCafferty v. Musat12/13/1990
Musat's legal malpractice was an injury personal to McCafferty, we further conclude that the trial court erred in denying McCafferty prejudgment interest from the date of the accident, as of which date he would have been entitled to pre-judgment interest in the underlying case absent Musat's malpractice. Therefore, the trial court erred in denying McCafferty's motion for prejudgment interest.
The judgment is affirmed as to Musat's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on McCafferty's negligence claim, and reversed as to the court's order denying pre-judgment interest.
Disposition
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND CAUSE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
|