 |
|
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Washington v. Janes2/3/1992 mmonly understood as such. State v. Hopper, 118 Wash. 2d 151, 158-59, 822 P.2d 775 (1992); State v. Dukowitz, 62 Wash. App. 418, 424, 814 P.2d 234 (1991). Here, we also note that the jury was specifically instructed that intent is a required element of assault. See Kjorsvik, 117 Wash. 2d at 102 n.13. There was no constitutional violation.
Reversed and remanded.
Disposition
Holding that the trial court should have admitted expert testimony regarding the battered child syndrome, that evidence of the defendant's reputation was properly excluded, that an instruction on diminished capacity was proper, and that the information was constitutionally sufficient, the court reverses the judgment.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Washington Personal Injury Attorneys
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
|
to fill out a simple form to connect to Personal Injury Lawyers in your area.
|
|